Skip to main content

Real-Time Compliance
Testing Platform

The industry tests 2–3% of transactions. We test 100% — in real time. AI-powered detection, examiner-perspective design, and full auditability across every compliance domain.

100% Transaction Coverage
13 Compliance Domains
Real-Time Detection & Alerting
Full Audit Trail

The Problem

The Industry Standard Is a Rounding Error

Regulators expect independent testing commensurate with your risk profile. The industry responds with 2–3% transaction sampling, batch processing, and point-in-time reviews. Structuring schemes, sanctions evasion, and compliance gaps slip through — and you find out during the exam, not before it.

2–3% Industry-standard transaction sampling rate
85–99% False positive rate in legacy AML systems
Hours–Days Typical detection lag from transaction to alert

Platform Capabilities

Built for How Examiners Actually Examine

Designed by a former enforcement attorney and regulatory examiners — every capability reflects what regulators look for, not what vendors assume they want.

100% Transaction Coverage

Every transaction tested in real time — not the industry-standard 2–3% sample. Structuring, layering, velocity anomalies, and threshold breaches caught as they happen, not weeks later.

AI-Driven Remediation

Machine learning identifies the root cause of every finding and recommends specific fixes — updated rules, threshold adjustments, policy changes — with implementation guidance your team can act on immediately.

Complete Audit Trail

Every test, every result, every remediation action logged with timestamps, user attribution, and regulatory mapping. Examination-ready from the moment you go live.

Regulatory Intelligence

Continuous monitoring of FFIEC, FinCEN, OCC, FDIC, Federal Reserve, FATF, and Wolfsberg updates. Rule changes mapped to your controls automatically — before your next exam, not after.

Cross-Domain Testing

BSA/AML, OFAC, KYC/CDD/EDD, Travel Rule, CTR/SAR accuracy, CIP, beneficial ownership, PEP screening, adverse media, fraud, fair lending, and consumer compliance — one platform.

Examiner-Perspective Design

Built by a former enforcement attorney and regulatory examiners. Every test, threshold, and report designed from the perspective of the people who will examine you.

Why It Matters

Sampling vs. Certainty

Legacy platforms test a fraction and call it compliance. Here's what changes when you test everything.

Metric Industry Standard 7T World Platform
Transaction Coverage 2–3% sample 100% of transactions
Detection Speed Hours to days Real-time (seconds)
Compliance Domains 1–3 per vendor 13 domains, one platform
False Positive Rate 85–99% <5% with ML tuning
Remediation Guidance Manual analysis AI-recommended fixes
Regulatory Updates Quarterly reviews Continuous monitoring
Audit Trail Periodic snapshots Continuous, immutable log
Testing Perspective Internal compliance Examiner-perspective

Comprehensive Coverage

13 Compliance Domains. One Platform.

No existing vendor covers all of these. Most cover two or three. We test across every domain your examiners will — because we've been those examiners.

BSA/AML Transaction Monitoring

Structuring, layering, integration, trade-based ML, shell company patterns — every typology tested against every transaction.

FFIEC BSA/AML Manual, FinCEN

OFAC / Sanctions Screening

Real-time SDN, consolidated, and sectoral list screening with fuzzy matching, name variations, and alias detection.

OFAC Compliance Framework

KYC / CDD / EDD

Customer risk scoring accuracy, periodic review adherence, source-of-funds documentation, and risk categorization validation.

FFIEC CDD Rule, Wolfsberg

Travel Rule Compliance

Originator and beneficiary data completeness for wire transfers and virtual asset transfers across jurisdictions.

FATF Rec. 16, FinCEN

CTR / SAR Filing Accuracy

Mandatory field completeness, narrative quality, filing timeliness (30/60-day windows), and escalation workflow validation.

FinCEN Forms 112 & 111

CIP Testing

Customer identification data collection, verification methods, government list checks, and exception handling procedures.

USA PATRIOT Act § 326

Beneficial Ownership

Identification and verification of 25%+ owners and controllers, periodic review schedules, and UBO change monitoring.

FinCEN BOI Rule

PEP Screening

Initial and ongoing screening, family/associate coverage, EDD application, and relationship change monitoring.

FATF Rec. 12, Wolfsberg

Adverse Media Monitoring

Global news source coverage, alert relevance scoring, false positive handling, and KYC data cross-referencing.

Wolfsberg, FATF Rec. 10

Fraud Detection Systems

Detection rule accuracy, typology coverage, false positive rates, real-time intervention capabilities, and AML integration.

FFIEC, OCC Heightened Standards

Fair Lending / UDAAP

Disparate impact analysis, geographic lending patterns, underwriting consistency, and pricing tier equity.

ECOA, Reg B, CFPB

Consumer Compliance

TILA/RESPA disclosure accuracy, APR calculations, tolerance compliance, and HMDA data collection/reporting.

TILA, RESPA, HMDA, TRID

Model Risk Management

Validation of transaction monitoring models, behavioral analytics, risk scoring systems, and detection algorithms.

Fed SR 11-7, OCC 2011-12

See It in Action

Explore a live preview of the real-time compliance testing platform — click through tabs to see how 7T World tests 100% of transactions, flags issues in real time, and provides AI-driven remediation guidance.

7T World — Real-Time Compliance Testing Platform
2,847,391
Transactions Tested
100%
Coverage Rate
47
Active Findings
0.3s
Avg. Detection Time
BSA/AML Transaction Monitoring100% — 0 gaps
OFAC / Sanctions Screening100% — 0 gaps
KYC / CDD / EDD100% — 2 findings
CTR / SAR Filing Accuracy100% — 5 findings
Travel Rule Compliance100% — 1 finding
Fair Lending / UDAAP100% — 0 gaps
PEP Screening & Adverse Media100% — 3 findings
Model Risk Management (SR 11-7)100% — 4 findings
TimeTxn IDTypeAmountTests RunStatusLatency
14:32:07.341TXN-9847201Intl. Wire$247,50013/13Pass0.18s
14:32:07.298TXN-9847200ACH Debit$9,80013/13Flag0.22s
14:32:07.255TXN-9847199FedNow$3,20013/13Pass0.14s
14:32:07.201TXN-9847198Card POS$142.8913/13Pass0.09s
14:32:07.187TXN-9847197Crypto (BTC)$18,75013/13Pass0.31s
14:32:07.142TXN-9847196Dom. Wire$9,95013/13Alert0.19s
14:32:07.098TXN-9847195BNPL$1,899.0013/13Pass0.11s
14:32:07.054TXN-9847194RTP$5,40013/13Pass0.16s
Live — 2,847,391 transactions tested today · 13 tests per transaction · 0.3s avg. latency
FIND-RT-2026-089High · BSA/AML
Structuring pattern detected: 4 domestic wire transfers from same originator in 72 hours, each between $9,800–$9,950. Aggregate $39,500 — below individual CTR threshold but above aggregate reporting trigger.
AI Remediation Recommendation
1. File SAR within 30 days (structuring — 31 USC § 5324). 2. Escalate to BSA Officer for enhanced monitoring. 3. Update velocity rules: flag same-originator wires >$9,000 within 72-hour rolling window. 4. Review related accounts for additional structuring patterns.
Domain: BSA/AMLDetected: 0.19sConfidence: 97.2%Status: Pending Review
FIND-RT-2026-087Medium · Sanctions
OFAC SDN fuzzy match (89% confidence): beneficiary name on international wire ($247,500 to UAE) matches SDN entry with single-character transposition. Prior screening system cleared — re-test caught discrepancy.
AI Remediation Recommendation
1. Hold transaction pending manual review (OFAC compliance). 2. Cross-reference against OFAC Consolidated list and EU sanctions. 3. Review screening system fuzzy-match threshold — current 85% may be too permissive for high-risk corridors. 4. Document false-positive determination or escalate to OFAC if true match.
Domain: OFAC/SanctionsDetected: 0.22sConfidence: 89.1%Status: In Review
FIND-RT-2026-084Info · Regulatory Update
FinCEN issued updated SAR filing FAQ (Feb 2026): documentation of decision NOT to file a SAR no longer required. 3 internal procedures reference this requirement and need updating.
AI Remediation Recommendation
1. Update SAR Decision Matrix (Policy 4.2.1) — remove "document non-filing rationale" requirement. 2. Update BSA/AML Procedures Manual § 7.3. 3. Update training materials for Q2 2026 cycle. 4. No impact on filed SARs — prospective change only.
Domain: Regulatory IntelSource: FinCEN FAQAffected: 3 proceduresStatus: Pending Update
TimestampEventDomainActorDetailsHash
2026-02-22 14:32:07Alert GeneratedBSA/AMLSystemFIND-RT-2026-089: Structuring patterna3f8c2...
2026-02-22 14:32:07AI AnalysisBSA/AMLAI EngineRemediation generated (4 steps)7b2e91...
2026-02-22 14:28:15Finding UpdatedOFACJ. MartinezFIND-RT-2026-087: Moved to In Reviewd4c7f0...
2026-02-22 14:15:00Reg UpdateRegulatorySystemFinCEN SAR FAQ change detectede9a1b3...
2026-02-22 13:45:22Finding ResolvedKYC/CDDA. ChenFIND-RT-2026-081: EDD docs received1f5d82...
2026-02-22 12:00:00Model ValidatedSR 11-7SystemTM Model v4.2: accuracy 98.7%, drift 0.02%c3b8a7...
2026-02-22 09:00:01Daily ReportAllSystem2,847,391 txns tested · 47 findings · 0 gapsf2e4d6...
Every entry cryptographically hashed · Immutable · Tamper-evident · Examiner-exportable

Want to see this configured for your institution?

Get a personalized walkthrough with your transaction volumes, compliance domains, and risk profile.

Request a Personalized Demo

Stop Sampling. Start Testing.

The industry tests 2–3% and hopes for the best. Your examiners won't. Whether you're evaluating your testing program or ready to move to 100% coverage — we have a path for you.

Recommended

Request a Testing Assessment

A 7T World specialist will evaluate your current testing program against all 13 compliance domains and deliver a gap analysis with examiner-perspective prioritization.

  • Coverage analysis across all 13 domains
  • Current sampling rate vs. risk exposure
  • Examiner-perspective gap prioritization
  • 30-minute executive briefing
Request Your Assessment
Free Resource

Download the Testing Framework

Our framework for mapping compliance testing across 13 domains — what examiners look for, what most institutions miss, and how 100% testing changes the equation.

  • 13-domain testing coverage map
  • Examiner expectations by domain
  • Sampling vs. 100% testing comparison
  • Implementation roadmap
Download the Framework (PDF)