Embedded stablecoin rails
Every road into stablecoins
ends in somebody else's app.
Except 7T World's. Bearings puts stablecoins inside your digital banking platform — the one your customers already use — under your brand and your economics. You modernize. The relationship stays yours.
See BearingsModernize without giving up the customer
You already have the relationship and the trust that comes with it. Modernizing into stablecoins should not cost you either. Bearings adds the capability inside the channel your customer already opens — so the experience gets better while the ownership stays exactly where it is. Bearings keeps the stablecoin experience — and the customer — inside your bank, under your brand.
Inside the banking they already use
Customers hold, send, and receive stablecoins in your digital banking platform — under your brand, your controls, your compliance foundation. Nobody gets handed to another exchange or digital asset provider.
Screening on the payment path, before money moves
KYC/KYB, AML and sanctions screening, wallet verification, and travel-rule checks run inline on every transaction. Not a batch review after the fact.
Deployed on your infrastructure
Your domain, your stack, your jurisdiction-specific policy and thresholds. No third-party hosting dependency sitting between you and your customer.
How a deployment starts
The launch is the easy part. We build for the exam that comes after.
Every Bearings deployment opens with advisory — your infrastructure, your risk and compliance posture, your vendors, and what your charter and jurisdiction will actually bear. The architecture gets built to that, not to a generic use case.
You could build this in-house. But the specialists you would assemble hand you pieces in isolation, not a cohesive whole — and stitching them together is a project of its own: evaluation, contracting, integration, and an engineering queue that is often twelve months out, behind an internal fight for priority. 7T World has already done that heavy lifting. The stack is vendor-agnostic, evaluated, selected, and integrated — largely pre-built, then customized to your institution, white-labeled and injected into your existing digital banking platform through APIs. You get the capability without the political queue or the drain on internal resources.
And it is done by people who have been on the other side of the exam. We understand every side of the financial industry because we've worked every side of it — as the regulator, the enforcement attorney, the compliance and risk officer, the operations lead, the engineer, and the founder. Bearings is compliance-native by design, which is what lets a deployment survive your risk committee.
The use case live today
Pay by Stablecoin
Stablecoin settlement, offered through your own digital banking platform. Card-network economics work for some flows and fail others — that's a property of the rail, not a judgment about the business standing on it. Where the rail fails, this is the alternative you can offer without handing your customer to anyone else.
A stablecoin is borderless by design. It settles wallet to wallet, anywhere the recipient holds one — you stay native, they handle their own local off-ramp, and no correspondent chain lifts a fee at every hop. For a business paying a supplier across a border, that's days and a chain of correspondent banks removed from the payment.
How a payment settles
Initiation
Payment starts in your digital banking channel, checkout, or API.
Compliance check
KYC/KYB, AML, sanctions, wallet verification, and travel-rule discipline — inline, before funds move.
Asset and liquidity validation
Permissibility, classification, liquidity, and gas availability where applicable.
Settlement
Settlement in seconds to minutes, anywhere in the world, wallet to wallet — with transparent, verifiable, immutable evidence recorded on the blockchain.
Evidence
The transaction record and its compliance documentation are written as it settles, not reconstructed before an exam.
Traditional rails vs. Bearings
Every major US payment rail — plus cards and SWIFT — compared on what an institution actually cares about: cost, speed, availability, reach, finality, and what the institution keeps.
| Dimension | ACH | Same-Day ACH | RTP | FedNow | Fedwire | SWIFT | Payment cards | Bearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost structure | ● A few cents per transaction1 | Cents, plus a 5.2¢ same-day surcharge1 | $0.045 flat, no monthly minimum2 | $0.045 + $25/mo per routing number3 | About $0.97 per transfer4 | $15–$50+ per wire, plus intermediary lifting fees & FX spread5 | About 1.57% of every $100 accepted — $187.2B in US merchant fees in 2024; the effective rate varies widely by card type and merchant category6 | A configurable network settlement fee the FI sets |
| Settlement speed | 1–2 business days1 | Same business day (3 windows)1 | ● Seconds2 | ● Seconds3 | Immediate & final once sent — Fedwire hours only; send timing varies by FI4 | Hours to days; most gpi wires under 24h5 | Auth instant; merchant funded in 1–3 business days6 | ● Seconds to minutes |
| Settlement availability | Banking days, business hours1 | Banking days, 3 daily windows1 | ● 24/7/3652 | ● 24/7/3653 | 22 hrs/day, Mon–Fri (excl. holidays); 22×6 by 2028–294 | Messaging 24/7; settlement bound to correspondent-bank hours5 | Authorization 24/7; settlement on banking days6 | ● 24/7/365 |
| Cross-border | Limited (Global ACH / IAT via correspondents)1 | Domestic US1 | Domestic US only2 | Domestic US only3 | US-domestic; settles the US leg of an international wire4 | ◆ Global reach — the incumbent, via the correspondent chain5 | Global, with cross-border + FX fees6 | ◆ Borderless, wallet-to-wallet — collapses the correspondent chain7 |
| Finality & evidence | Reversible; returns up to 60 days (consumer)1 | Reversible; return windows apply1 | ● Irrevocable, credit-push2 | ● Irrevocable3 | ● Immediate, final, irrevocable4 | Final on settlement; multi-intermediary, historically opaque5 | Not final — chargeback-exposed6 | ● Final at settlement, with transparent, verifiable, immutable on-chain evidence |
| Net to the FI | FI keeps the (small) fee it sets1 | FI keeps the fee it sets1 | FI keeps the fee it sets2 | FI keeps the fee it sets3 | FI keeps the wire fee it sets4 | Fees shared down the correspondent chain; the FX spread is often the biggest cost5 | The interchange — the largest fee — flows to the buyer's issuing bank and the networks, not the merchant's FI8 | ● The FI sets the pricing and keeps the economics — no third party takes a cut |
- 1 NACHA — ACH network administration fees and Same Day ACH rules (per-payment limit rising to $10M, effective Sept 17, 2027).
- 2 The Clearing House — RTP® network: $0.045 per credit transfer, 24/7/365, irrevocable credit-push; $10M transaction limit (Feb 2025).
- 3 Federal Reserve — FedNow® Service pricing ($0.045 per credit transfer; $25/mo per routing number), 24/7/365; limit raised to $10M (Nov 2025).
- 4 Federal Reserve — Fedwire® Funds Service 2025 fee (about $0.97 gross per transfer) and hours (22 hrs/day, Mon–Fri; 22×6 expansion approved for 2028–29).
- 5 SWIFT / industry — cross-border correspondent-banking fees ($15–$50+ per wire plus intermediary lifting fees & FX spread); SWIFT gpi credits most wires within 24h.
- 6 Nilson Report — US merchants paid $187.2B to accept cards in 2024, about $1.57 for every $100 of card payments — a blended average. Published Visa and Mastercard interchange schedules set rates by card type (rewards and commercial cards cost more) and merchant category, so the effective rate varies widely.
- 7 Cross-border “best” depends on your use case: SWIFT has the widest bank reach today; Bearings settles wallet-to-wallet without a correspondent chain.
- 8 Federal Reserve, Regulation II — interchange is paid by the merchant’s acquirer to compensate the cardholder’s issuing bank; interchange is the largest component of card-acceptance cost (Nilson Report).
Figures reflect published network fees and rules as of July 2026 and are point-in-time; card figures are US market-wide averages (Nilson Report). Bearings economics are configured per institution.
Fit
What your charter will bear is the whole question.
No two institutions get the same answer here, and the difference is not size — it is what you are. A bank answers to the FDIC, the OCC, or the Federal Reserve by charter, and its stablecoin posture is a conversation with its primary regulator. A credit union answers to the NCUA, within its field of membership. An MSB answers to FinCEN and its state money-transmitter licensors. A fintech answers for the bank partnered behind it — and that bank's risk committee is the one that has to be satisfied.
Bearings is built to be shaped to that, not sold around it. The advisory that opens every deployment exists precisely because the right architecture for a $400 million community bank and a $30 billion regional are not the same architecture.
Stop handing your customer to somebody else's app.
See it working
See stablecoin send and receive running inside a digital banking platform — under the bank's brand, with the compliance path visible underneath it.
See a demoWeighing build vs. buy
Bring your charter, your stack, and your risk posture, and you'll get a read on what Bearings does today, what fits your institution, and what your charter will bear — from a founder, not a sales rep. The value is the read, whether or not you build with us.
Get an honest readTo get your bearings is to know where you stand and which way you are heading before you move. A new rail should not cost you either. Get your bearings →
7T World · Bearings
Global Innovation, Anchored in Trust.
Bearings is part of 7T World's Payments Modernization family — compliance-native by design, and composable with the rest of the portfolio when you want it. No product depends on another. View all services →